Page - 1547

     Joseph A. Tucker died on 2 October 1939 at Washington, DC.

     Joseph L Tucker married Nannie Christina Robey. Joseph L Tucker was born at Charles County, MD. He died before 1900.
     Marriage and chidren's names are from Annapolis/Eastport Families, of which only two pages are in file as of April 2010.

     William Tucker was born in 1500 at Throwley, Devonshire, England. He married Josea Ashe, daughter of William Ashe, circa 1531. William Tucker died in 1564.

     Catharine Tudor married Cornelius Bogardus, son of Cornelis Bogardus and Rachel DeWitt, on 18 February 1721.
     Married name: Bogardus.

     John Tudor married Aelfje Van Hoorn, daughter of Jan Cornellison Van Hoorn and Hillegonde Joris, on 14 April 1675.
     John Tudor was Type: Children four.

     Aaron V Tuers married Matilda. Aaron V Tuers was born circa 1830 at New Jersey. He was born in 1830 at New Jersey. He married Martha L Richardson, daughter of Isaac Richardson Richardson and Matilda Baines, on 14 September 1867 at Anne Arundel County, MD. Aaron V Tuers died before 1880.
     This is most likely the Aaron V. Tuers, who in about 1860 settled in Maryland.

In his record of marriage to Martha L Richardson, he is listed as a widower.

We have few primary sources for this individual. We are basing our conclusion on the available evidence, given that his grandfather's name was Aaron Vanderbilt we find the coincidence significant to note since Aaron's mother, Sarah Prior Vanderbilt similarly bears the name of her maternal grandmother. This naming convention was frequently used by early Dutch descendants who had abandoned the patronymic, but still retained similar family naming traditions. We have also found other reference to the family members, including Aaron Tuers widow traveling back to New Jersey and living with family in the area of Abraham Tuers' farm.

This is possibly the Aaron V. Tuers, who in about 1860 settled in Maryland. We have NO proof of this individual, however, given that his grandfather's name was Aaron Vanderbilt, we find the coincidence significant to note since Aaron's mother, Sarah Prior Vanderbilt similarly bears the name of her maternal grandmother.

We also find him in the Anne Arundel, Annapolis, MD Federal 1860 Census as Aaron Tuers, and again in the 1870 Census as Aaron Tours, both in Annapolis, Maryland, but with different wive's names and children's names. Based on the ages of the children and Martha, age 22, in 1870, it is not biologically feasible for these to be her children, but may be children by Aaron's former marriage:

1860 Census
Aaron Tuers, age 30, Sailor, born New York
Matilda, age 25, born New York
Elizabeth, age 1, born Maryland (likely the same as Mary Elizabeth in later records)
Charles, age 3 months, born Maryland (Charles Newton Tuers in later records)

1870 Census
Aaron Tours, age 42, Sailor, born New Jersey
Martha, age 22, born Virginia
Harrison, age 14, farm laborer, born New Jersey
Mary, age 12, born Maryland, (Mary Elizabeth Tuers abt 1860 in later records)
Arthur, age 10, born Maryland, (Arthur M. Tuers in later records)
Matilda Richardson, mother-in-law, age 54

In the 1880 Census Martha and children are living in the Port of Baltimore with Matilda Richardson listed as head of household, and Aaron is not found.
1880 Census
Matilda Richardson, age 68, Keeping house
George W, age 30, Laborer
Tuers, Martha, age 32, daughter, At Home
Thomas, age 3, grandson
Rosa, age, 6, granddaughter (Rosa Ella in later records)
Emma, age 9, grandaughter.

     Abraham Tuers was born on 16 June 1839 at New Jersey. He died on 30 June 1839.

     Abraham Tuers married Catherine Marie Sandford. Abraham Tuers died on 1 March 1856 at Hudson County, NJ.
     This record is tenuously based solely on the minimal records we have found noting that Abraham is s/o William; that an Abraham Tuers is buried at Sanford Burying Ground alongside Catherine Tuers (most likely Catherine Sandford); and, that William is s/o Abraham and Catherine Tuers due to death date and correlation with grandfather's name. Corrections are invited and welcome.

     Abraham Tuers was born circa 1810.
     Church records note that he is "of Newark"

Marriages ?Extracted from ?Commemorative History of the ?Presbyterian Church in Westfield, New Jersey ?1728-1928 ?by Wm. K. McKINNEY, Ph. D. ?Chas. A. PHILHOWER, A. M. ?Harry A. KNIFFIN.

     Abraham Tuers was born on 27 November 1821 at Belleville Twp, Essex County, NJ. He was baptized on 24 March 1822 at Second River Reformed Dutch Church, Belleville, NJ. He married Leah Ann Garrabrant, daughter of Michael Garrabrant and Annatje (Hannah) Van Winkle, on 3 June 1850. Abraham Tuers died on 17 February 1890 at age 68.
     B. Jan., 1822. March 4, bap. Abraham, son of Garret Tours and Hiley Kingsland,
Second River DRC records differ slightly

1850 Census, Hudson, Bergen
Abraham Tuers, age 19, wagon maker, Value of Real Estate 2000
Leah Tuers, age 31 (believe this is error, should be age 21)
Cornelius, age 3 is living in household at 1850 Census, Hudson, Bergen
Abraham Seeley, age 19, wagon maker. He was (an unknown value).

     Abraham A Tuers was born on 1 February 1789 at Passaic, NJ, (possibly 1793 Lodi, Bergen, NJ, but then baptism is wrong also). He was baptized on 22 February 1789. He married Sarah Prior Vanderbilt, daughter of Aaron Vanderbilt and Ariantie Vanderhoef, on 1 January 1827 at Reformed Dutch Church, Bergen, NJ. Abraham A Tuers died in August 1854 at New Barbadoes, Bergen County, NJ, at age 65 (unconfirmed).
     Accounts of the death date of Abraham A. Tuers vary, with summaries of the court case involving his estate placing "death" either in 1850 or 1854. In either event, he was deemed dead, and without a will, and the estate was divided by the court in 1862, with a value of about $150,000. It was an important enough case that it was subject of an article in the New York Times. Several accounts of the case are available, and we hold two accounts in file.

Abraham A. Tuers Cases in Chancery
Hoyt v Tuers

WILLIAM W. HOYT and wife v. WILLIAM TUERS et al.
?Abraham Tuers died intestate in 1850, seized of lands in Hudson county, and leaving six children and two grandchildren, his heirs-at-law. One of the sons, Abraham A. Tuers, Jr, left New Jersey in 1854, leaving his wife and children here, and never returned. For twenty years his family neither saw him nor heard from him, but heard that he was dead. In 1874 they ascertained that he was living in California, and one of his sons, William, saw him there. He died in 1877. In 1862, under proceedings in the orphans court of Hudson county, the lands of Abraham Tuers were partitioned, the heirs-at-law of Hoyt v. Tuers. Abraham A. Tuers being made parties thereto. On an allegation of his death intestate, and by sundry means conveyances thereunder, the defendants claim parts of the premises. In 1871, Abraham A. Tuers executed a conveyance in California in favor of Hoyt, the complainant, of all his property, real and personal, in New Jersey; and in July, 1874, another, conveying, inter alia, all interest etc. as one of the children and heirs-at-law of his father and mother, or either of them; and in August, 1874, another, conveying, by specific ?metes and bounds, the lands set off to Abraham A. Tuers's heirs-at-law in the partition of 1862. On a bill for a partition, filed by Hoyt, in chancery, against the defendants as part owners of the premises, and also to set aside the partition of 1862, the defendants, by answer, set up that Abraham A. Tuers (Jr.) was, when he made the alleged conveyances to Hoyt, incompetent to make them, by reason of unsoundness of mind, and that they were obtained by fraud. - Held, that the complainant's title being denied, the suit would be stayed, to afford the complainant an opportunity to establish the title at law, and that although evidence was adduced in this cause on the subject of the defence to the deeds, the defendants were nevertheless entitled to try the question of the validity of complainant's title at law. ?Bill for partition. On final hearing on pleadings and proof. ?Mr. John J. King and Mr. P. Woodruff", for complainants. ?Mr. Edward Q. Keasbey, for Newark Land Company and ?others. ?Mr. G. W. Hubbell, for Francis Sipp and others. ?THE CHANCELLOR. ?The complainants seek to set aside a partition of land in Hudson County, made in the orphans court of that county in 1862, and to partition the property in this court. The wife joins her husband as complainant only in view of her claim of inchoate right of dower in the property to which her husband claims title. The land was owned by Abraham Tuers, who died in 1850 intestate. At his death his heirs-at-law were his ?six children and two grandchildren, the children of a deceased daughter. In 1862, application was made to the orphans court by his son William for partition of the property. From the order appointing the commissioners, it would seem that, in his petition (it is lost, and no copy of it is produced), the petitioner stated that his brother Abraham (generally known as Abramam A. Tuers) was dead, and had died intestate, and that among his heirs-at-law were two minors, Andrew and Eliza Tuers, two of his children. The property was found, capable of being partitioned without great prejudice to the interests of the owners, and was divided accordingly, and the partition confirmed. The persons to whom two of the shares were assigned in the partition, conveyed them to the Newark Land Company, and that company claims them, and also part of another of the shares conveyed to it in like manner. Abraham A. Tuers in 1854 left this state, leaving his wife and children here, and never returned to it. He went to California, and remained there up to the time of his death, which occurred in 1877. His son William having heard that he was in California, went there in 1874 and saw him there. William testifies that he neither saw nor heard from his father for twenty-two years after the latter left this state, and that the family had heard that he was dead. In March, 1871, Abraham A. Tuers executed a conveyance in California, in favor of Hoyt, for all his right, title and interest of, in and to all his property, real and personal, in New Jersey, and especially all his claims to the estate of his father and mother, or the estate of either of them. On the 1st of July, 1874, he executed a deed to Hoyt, by which, in consideration of $1,000, as expressed in the deed, he conveyed a tract of land of one hundred and ten acres, or thereabouts, in this state, described in the deed as being situated in Morris county, about six miles from Morristown, and about three miles from Rockaway, and the same land occupied and possessed by the grantor in person, and by his family, and at that time occupied by William Tuers, his son. The deed conveyed, also, all other pieces, parcels, tracts, lots or bodies of land or real estate in New Jersey which he owned, or of, in or to which he had any kind, nature or character of right, title, claim or interest, legal or equitable, whether the same had been acquired by purchase, bequest, devise, descent or otherwise, and also all the interest, right, title, claim and demand which he then had or might thereafter have or be entitled to as one of the children and heirs-at-Iaw of his father and mother

? In August, 1874, he executed another deed to Hoyt, which, after reciting that he had executed and delivered the deed, of July preceding, and that it contained no specific or accurate description of any real estate, but did contain general and comprehensive reference to the grantor's real estate in this state, and that he intended thereby to convey to Hoyt the land thereinafter more specifically described and bounded, conveyed to ?Hoyt, for a nominal consideration, the land set off in the partition as the share of his, the grantor's, heirs-at-law, and nothing more. William M.Tuers testifies that, when he went to California, he reached Sacramento City June 29th, 1874, and left there for home on the 4th of July following. He says that he told Hoyt and Hoyt's lawyer and his father, while he was there, that the partition had taken place. Hoyt alleges that the description of the share was inserted by mistake - that it was supposed to be the description of the whole of the land in Hudson county of which Abraham Tuers, his grantor's father, died seized. The answering defendants object to the bill as being multifarious, inasmuch as it seeks, as they insist, to rectify the alleged mistake in the last-mentioned deed, and also to set aside the partition in the orphans court, and obtain a new one. It is enough to say, on this point, that were the objection well founded, it would, in this case, come too late, since it was made for the first time at the final hearing. It is not well founded, however. The bill does not pray a reformation of the deed. But, without considering any of the other objections made by the answering defendants to a decree for partition, it is sufficient at this stage of the proceedings to say that the complainant's title, which is a legal one, is disputed; and it is an established rule of this court that where the title of the complainant in a partition suit is disputed (unless it is an equitable one), this court will not settle it on the hearing, but will compel the complainant to establish it at law first, and the bill will be retained until he shall have so established it. The land company, by its answer, expressly denies the validity of the deeds to Hoyt, and avers that the grantor therein was, when they were executed.

Excerpted from

CASES DECIDED IN ?THE COURT OF CHANCERY. ?THE PREROGATIVE COURT, ?AND, ON APPEAL, ?The Court of Errors and Appeals, ?OF THE ?STATE OF NEW JERSEY. ?JOHN H. STEWART. REPORTER. ?VOL. VIII. ?TRENTON, N. J.: ?THE W. S. SHARP PRINTING Co. ?1882.

Accounts of the death date of Abraham A. Tuers vary, with summaries of the court case involving his estate placing "death" either in 1850 or 1854. In either event, he was deemed dead, and without a will, and the estate was divided by the court in 1862, with a value of about $150,000. It was an important enough case that it was subject of an article in the New York Times. Several accounts of the case are available, and we hold two accounts in file. It looks to this researcher, that his son, Abraham A. Tuers, Jr. took off to the California Gold Rush that began in 1849, and no intention of returning.

Abraham A. Tuers Cases in Chancery
Hoyt v Tuers

WILLIAM W. HOYT and wife v. WILLIAM TUERS et al.
?Abraham Tuers died intestate in 1850, seized of lands in Hudson county, and leaving six children and two grandchildren, his heirs-at-law. One of the sons, Abraham A. Tuers, Jr, left New Jersey in 1854, leaving his wife and children here, and never returned. For twenty years his family neither saw him nor heard from him, but heard that he was dead. In 1874 they ascertained that he was living in California, and one of his sons, William, saw him there. He died in 1877. In 1862, under proceedings in the orphans court of Hudson county, the lands of Abraham Tuers were partitioned, the heirs-at-law of Hoyt v. Tuers. Abraham A. Tuers being made parties thereto. On an allegation of his death intestate, and by sundry means conveyances thereunder, the defendants claim parts of the premises. In 1871, Abraham A. Tuers executed a conveyance in California in favor of Hoyt, the complainant, of all his property, real and personal, in New Jersey; and in July, 1874, another, conveying, inter alia, all interest etc. as one of the children and heirs-at-law of his father and mother, or either of them; and in August, 1874, another, conveying, by specific ?metes and bounds, the lands set off to Abraham A. Tuers's heirs-at-law in the partition of 1862. On a bill for a partition, filed by Hoyt, in chancery, against the defendants as part owners of the premises, and also to set aside the partition of 1862, the defendants, by answer, set up that Abraham A. Tuers (Jr.) was, when he made the alleged conveyances to Hoyt, incompetent to make them, by reason of unsoundness of mind, and that they were obtained by fraud. - Held, that the complainant's title being denied, the suit would be stayed, to afford the complainant an opportunity to establish the title at law, and that although evidence was adduced in this cause on the subject of the defence to the deeds, the defendants were nevertheless entitled to try the question of the validity of complainant's title at law. ?Bill for partition. On final hearing on pleadings and proof. ?Mr. John J. King and Mr. P. Woodruff", for complainants. ?Mr. Edward Q. Keasbey, for Newark Land Company and ?others. ?Mr. G. W. Hubbell, for Francis Sipp and others. ?THE CHANCELLOR. ?The complainants seek to set aside a partition of land in Hudson County, made in the orphans court of that county in 1862, and to partition the property in this court. The wife joins her husband as complainant only in view of her claim of inchoate right of dower in the property to which her husband claims title. The land was owned by Abraham Tuers, who died in 1850 intestate. At his death his heirs-at-law were his ?six children and two grandchildren, the children of a deceased daughter. In 1862, application was made to the orphans court by his son William for partition of the property. From the order appointing the commissioners, it would seem that, in his petition (it is lost, and no copy of it is produced), the petitioner stated that his brother Abraham (generally known as Abramam A. Tuers) was dead, and had died intestate, and that among his heirs-at-law were two minors, Andrew and Eliza Tuers, two of his children. The property was found, capable of being partitioned without great prejudice to the interests of the owners, and was divided accordingly, and the partition confirmed. The persons to whom two of the shares were assigned in the partition, conveyed them to the Newark Land Company, and that company claims them, and also part of another of the shares conveyed to it in like manner. Abraham A. Tuers in 1854 left this state, leaving his wife and children here, and never returned to it. He went to California, and remained there up to the time of his death, which occurred in 1877. His son William having heard that he was in California, went there in 1874 and saw him there. William testifies that he neither saw nor heard from his father for twenty-two years after the latter left this state, and that the family had heard that he was dead. In March, 1871, Abraham A. Tuers executed a conveyance in California, in favor of Hoyt, for all his right, title and interest of, in and to all his property, real and personal, in New Jersey, and especially all his claims to the estate of his father and mother, or the estate of either of them. On the 1st of July, 1874, he executed a deed to Hoyt, by which, in consideration of $1,000, as expressed in the deed, he conveyed a tract of land of one hundred and ten acres, or thereabouts, in this state, described in the deed as being situated in Morris county, about six miles from Morristown, and about three miles from Rockaway, and the same land occupied and possessed by the grantor in person, and by his family, and at that time occupied by William Tuers, his son. The deed conveyed, also, all other pieces, parcels, tracts, lots or bodies of land or real estate in New Jersey which he owned, or of, in or to which he had any kind, nature or character of right, title, claim or interest, legal or equitable, whether the same had been acquired by purchase, bequest, devise, descent or otherwise, and also all the interest, right, title, claim and demand which he then had or might thereafter have or be entitled to as one of the children and heirs-at-Iaw of his father and mother

? In August, 1874, he executed another deed to Hoyt, which, after reciting that he had executed and delivered the deed, of July preceding, and that it contained no specific or accurate description of any real estate, but did contain general and comprehensive reference to the grantor's real estate in this state, and that he intended thereby to convey to Hoyt the land thereinafter more specifically described and bounded, conveyed to ?Hoyt, for a nominal consideration, the land set off in the partition as the share of his, the grantor's, heirs-at-law, and nothing more. William M.Tuers testifies that, when he went to California, he reached Sacramento City June 29th, 1874, and left there for home on the 4th of July following. He says that he told Hoyt and Hoyt's lawyer and his father, while he was there, that the partition had taken place. Hoyt alleges that the description of the share was inserted by mistake - that it was supposed to be the description of the whole of the land in Hudson county of which Abraham Tuers, his grantor's father, died seized. The answering defendants object to the bill as being multifarious, inasmuch as it seeks, as they insist, to rectify the alleged mistake in the last-mentioned deed, and also to set aside the partition in the orphans court, and obtain a new one. It is enough to say, on this point, that were the objection well founded, it would, in this case, come too late, since it was made for the first time at the final hearing. It is not well founded, however. The bill does not pray a reformation of the deed. But, without considering any of the other objections made by the answering defendants to a decree for partition, it is sufficient at this stage of the proceedings to say that the complainant's title, which is a legal one, is disputed; and it is an established rule of this court that where the title of the complainant in a partition suit is disputed (unless it is an equitable one), this court will not settle it on the hearing, but will compel the complainant to establish it at law first, and the bill will be retained until he shall have so established it. The land company, by its answer, expressly denies the validity of the deeds to Hoyt, and avers that the grantor therein was, when they were executed.

Excerpted from

CASES DECIDED IN ?THE COURT OF CHANCERY. ?THE PREROGATIVE COURT, ?AND, ON APPEAL, ?The Court of Errors and Appeals, ?OF THE ?STATE OF NEW JERSEY. ?JOHN H. STEWART. REPORTER. ?VOL. VIII. ?TRENTON, N. J.: ?THE W. S. SHARP PRINTING Co. ?1882.

     Abraham A Tuers Jr. was born on 3 February 1829. He married Sarah C Ford, daughter of Lewis Ford and Rhoda Riggs. Abraham A Tuers Jr. died on 11 April 1909 at Morris, NJ, at age 80.

     Ada B Tuers was born on 25 September 1885 at Riverton, Franklin County, NE. She married Fremont C Canfield. Ada B Tuers married Charles A Hibler on 8 October 1917 at Battle Creek, MI. Ada B Tuers died on 12 April 1955 at Saginaw, MI, at age 69.
     Name variation: Ada B Hibler. Name variation: Ada B Canfield. She was Baptist. She appeared on the census of 1900 at Saginaw, Saginaw County, MI. Ada Canfield, age 29, as Head of Household with "sisters" Mary W, age 25, and Carolyn, age 16. Cannot confirm this Ada Canfield as Ada Tuers since DOB doesn't correlate. She appeared on the census of 1910 at Branch County, MI. Alfred C. Tuers, age 63, and a stepson Clyde L. Tuers, age 4 living in household with Fremont Canfield, age 47 Head of Household. She appeared on the census of 1920 at Detroit City, Wayne County, MI. Ada B. age 33 as Wife living with Charles A. Hibler, age 49 as HoH, and Clyde L. Canfield, age 13, as "Son". Hibler's father POB is Pennsylvania, mother POB is Ireland.

     Adeline Tuers was born in 1836.

     Agnes Tuers was born circa 1893 at Morris, NJ.

     Albert Bartholf Tuers was born on 25 July 1836 at Passaic, NJ. He was baptized on 5 November 1836 at Pompton Plains, Morris County, NJ. He married Priscilla Demarest on 28 August 1862 at Old North Church, Dumont, NJ. Albert Bartholf Tuers was buried in January 1907 at South Schraaalenburgh Churchyard. He died on 6 January 1907 at age 70.
     He was (an unknown value). Albert and Priscilla lived in Teaneck, NJ in 1895 according to the NJ State Census. Albert was a Civil War veteran and is buried at the South Schraalenburgh Churchyard Old North Reformed Church Cemetery, Dumont, Bergen, NJ

The Demarest Genealogy, in our file, shows Albert Bertolph Tuers born 1837, married Priscilla Demarest.
RES 1895, Teaneck, NJ, NJ State Census.
He was (an unknown value).

     Albert Bartolph Tuers was born on 27 December 1887.

     Alford C. Tuers was born on 27 December 1847 at Michigan. He married Nancy Ann Preston in 1877. Alford C. Tuers died on 22 January 1921 at Coldwater, Branch County, MI, at age 73.

     Alice Tuers was buried at Oak Grove Cemetery, Coldwater, MI. She was born in 1865 at Coldwater, Branch County, MI. She died on 2 December 1880 at Coldwater, Branch County, MI, Pneumonia.
     On the death of his daughter, Alice, Walter Tuers purchased Lot 71 Oakgrove Cemetery, Coldwater MI for $15. There is a record of 13 burials in that lot.

     Amelia Tuers was born circa 1849.

     Amos Lorenz Tuers was born on 24 April 1883 at Franklin, Nutley, Essex County, NJ. He died in April 1969 at Manasquan, Monmouth County, NJ.
     WW I Registration lists sister, Mary Elizabeth Tuers, as NOK living at 26 Woodland Ave, Nutley, Essex, NJ. At 35 years of age, Amos was apparently not married.

In 1945 he lived in Asbury Park and worked as a helper for Style Molders in Manasquan during his later years.
RES 1918: 26 Woodland Ave, Nutley, NJ.
He was (an unknown value).

     Anderson Tuers was born on 18 June 1855 at Belleville, Essex County, NJ. He died on 9 July 1875 at age 20.

     Andrew Jackson Tuers was born in 1846 at Hanover, Morris County, NJ. He was born circa 1846 at New Jersey. He married Lydia A Smith, daughter of John J. Smith, on 18 March 1896 at Morristown, Morris County, NJ. Andrew Jackson Tuers died in 1911 at New Jersey. He died in 1911 at New Jersey.
     Children's names and birth dates taken from 1880 Census, Hanover, Morris, NJ

1900 Census Parsippiny, Northern District Hanover, Morris, NJ lists wife Frances, age 42.

1920 Census Hanover Twp, Morris, NJ, Frances, Age 62, Mother-in-law, is listed living in the household of Frank Steitz, Age 41; Clare, Wife, Age 35; Frank, Jr, Age 3 1/2 (illegible)

Served in the Civil War with the New Jersey Volunteers, Company L, 27th Regiment.

Children's names and birth dates taken from 1880 Census, Hanover, Morris, NJ

1900 Census Parsippiny, Northern District Hanover, Morris, NJ lists wife Frances, age 42.
I1920 Census Hanover Twp, Morris, NJ, Frances, Age 62, Mother-in-law, is listed living in the household of Frank Steitz, Age 41; Clare, Wife, Age 35; Frank, Jr, Age 3 1/2 (illegible)

Served in the Civil War with the New Jersey Volunteers, Company L, 27th Regiment.

     Andrew Jackson Tuers was buried at Evergreen Cemetery, Morristown, Morris, NJ. He married Mary L Grimes, daughter of James A. Grimes and Rosannah. Andrew Jackson Tuers was born circa 1868 at Hanover, Morris County, NJ. He died in 1931.
     1920 Census, Morris, Hanover, District 17, NJ dated d15 January 1920
Lists:
Tuers, Andrew J, age 52, Teamster
Mary L, Wife, age 52
Hoffman (lined out), Thea or Tess, Daughter (Step), age 21
Tuers, Edward A, Son, age 15
Sadie L, Daughter, age 13

1930 Census, Hanover, Morris, Village of Whippany, dtd April 9, 1930 NJ Lists:
Andrew J Tuers, age 62, working as a laborer in odd jobs
Mary L Tuers, age 63, Wife
Sadie L Tuers, age 22 working as a stenographer in a paper mill
Mary L Darby, age 7, GrandDau
William Darby, age 9, GrandSon.

     Ann Tuers was born on 1 December 1809.

     Ann Tuers was born at Bergen County, NJ.

     Anna E Tuers was born circa 1860 at Essex County, NJ.

     Anna Eliza Tuers married Edward K Smith. Anna Eliza Tuers was born on 15 September 1846 at Danville, NJ. She was born on 15 September 1846 at Danville, NJ. She died on 22 September 1939 at Saginaw, MI, at age 93.
     Residence in 1860 was Rockaway, Morris, NJ (1860 Census). Name variation: Anna Eliza Smith.

     Anna L. Tuers was born on 21 July 1855 at Passaic County, NJ. She was baptized on 25 March 1856 at Dutch Reformed Church, Acquackanonk, Essex County, NJ. She died in 1907.
     Annie was living with her brother, John J, in Hillsdale according to the 1900 Census.

     Anna M Tuers married Harvey M Dean. Anna M Tuers was born on 29 January 1915 at Bergenfield, NJ. She died on 8 May 1998 at Kingman, AZ, at age 83.
     Name variation: Anna M Dean.